Shaping the environment

 
  Remember the notes we used to pass back and forth when we were children?
The ones that asked "Do you think Johnny likes me?" Or, which person is cuter? And it continued, as  some  went as far as the Jr. High school petition yearbook opinion poll?

   Well those types of questions are still asked.

   Just as simply, just as directly, and with just as much complex return information as it gave us back then. (Think about it, that question's response was crucial to your social development.)

   Well, that information is still just as important today. Ask any person in retail marketing, quality control, politics, etc. But most importantly, ourselves.
It's access to information such as this that we are all talking about. The information we will access regularly that help us shape our environment.
<strong>SHAPING THE ENVIRONMENT PRINCIPLE:</strong>
 (For more on this principle see:

  This "shaping of the environment" principle is being misunderstood, minimized, and summarily dismissed, that is causing a lot of confusion. And since most people see these  ideas and images as a potential for the loss of their individuality, they "shut down" the logic responses, and refer to the emotional, or "variable (Sq)" regions in order to understand the negative integer. Self, plus many, equals loss of self.  ( 1 + 1 = -1)
 .
  So, they break the logic circuitry by utilizing the thought patterns that make us different. I call it "Negative Logic." I hypothesize that an integrated yet separate circuitry calculates pure variables in order to come up with solutions. In this case, creating a need-(fear), which gives to an idea as result of running all variable models until a solution that fits can be applied.
 
  Just like when common sense tells you one thing, but your gut tells you another and is right, or in this case, "It's something else", that leads to a subject source-(authority), a connecting source of logic information, that can be applied and measured. It does this by returning to the Neg. logic table, where sure enough, the model suggests a common resulting equation "Public opinion." (Statistical (logical) evaluation of the (Neg. logic/Variable based) collective table equals public or "collective" opinion.

  logic of the solution,and seeks to quantify it's measure (Those who, that can be measured quantify that potential loss so that it can be accounted for in the equation,